Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Cesarczyk

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:14, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Paul Cesarczyk]]=

:{{la|Paul Cesarczyk}} ([{{fullurl:Paul Cesarczyk|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Cesarczyk}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Paul Cesarczyk}})

Non-notable academic, no citation record, extremely thin news coverage (two hits), references currently only to his own faculty bio page. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete, the two News hits seem to be mere entries in a list of upcoming recitals. Abductive (reasoning) 00:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Musicians may care to comment. Other than that Delete. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC).
Delete I put the prod on this article, which was contested by an editor who asserted notability. I requested a rationale for this notability, but got no response. 99of9 (talk) 06:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.