Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Deng

:{{la|Paul Deng}} ([{{fullurl:Paul Deng|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Deng}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable cinematographer. No references, no claim to notability. Working in low-level positions in not notable, even if the films are notable. Maybe if some aspect of that work is innovative, influential, or ground-breaking ... but that's not the case here, and the article makes no case for it. Mikeblas (talk) 02:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:28, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete As currently written, the article is one sentence and then a list of Paul's projects... not even a complete list... and unsourced. Though Deng has worked on a number of notable projects, I am in agreement with the nom as there is no assertion of notability... and nothing explaining why his camerawork or assistant camerawork is specially notable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per above - insufficient notability. The [http://stats.grok.se/en/200812/Paul_Deng page view stats] show a max of 8 views in a day, and that is the minority, on average 0-2 views. Article is around 18 months old and still in a limited state. I don't believe there is sufficient info available to expand and/or warrant inclusion. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.