Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Kulikovsky

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Paul Kulikovsky]]=

{{ns:0|B}}

:{{la|Paul Kulikovsky}} ([{{fullurl:Paul Kulikovsky|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Kulikovsky}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

If one takes out the description of his relations, there is no article. Entirely lacks notability. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 16:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Per Gareth. If I am personally related to George Washington, I still have to do something myself to be notable. J.delanoygabsadds 16:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as said above. He didn't really do anything himself to be notable. Hatmatbbat10Talk to me 17:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete He did nothing to be notable, So he doesn't deserve an article. Apex Glide (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment I'm finding many more of these articles now that I'm looking...Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, no indication of even limited aristocratic notability (title, etc.). Wikipedia is not Majesty magazine or whoever it is that considers these people important. --Dhartung | Talk 19:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.