Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Lamb (author)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Paul Lamb (author)]]=

:{{la|Paul Lamb (author)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paul_Lamb_(author) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Paul Lamb (author)}})

An extremely promotional page on a non-notable individual (in the encyclopedic sense). Subject does not meet any of the criteria of WP:NAUTHOR. Sourcing is very weak and I couldn't find any better; the only RS here is the one from the Hamilton Spectator. Article also has an interesting story of declined drafts and SPAs. RetiredDuke (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 22:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 22:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete self-sourced PROMO for which WP has been serving as a BILLBOARD since 2015.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing from GNEWS, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Lapablo (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.