Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Surridge

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Paula Surridge}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Paula Surridge}})

Professor. No RS or SIGCOV (The Guardian link is to contributed content), fails WP:GNG; WP:NACADEMIC Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
• Comment. Not my area but the top citations in GS [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=PafT-UYAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao] are quite promising (201,179,127,93,87) though total citations are fairly low. There are 3 coauthored books, for which reviews should be sought. The Guardian appears to treat her as an expert. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

::Changing to Keep per reviews found by David Eppstein. Espresso Addict (talk) 21:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

• Weak keep. I found two reviews each of two books, added to the article. Because the books are coauthored and two of the reviews are of multiple books, I think by themselves they would only make a borderline case for WP:AUTHOR but putting them together with the citation record above and WP:PROF#C1 I think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.