Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulette Steeves

:{{la|Paulette Steeves}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paulette_Steeves Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Paulette Steeves}})

Fails WP:PROF by a long way and seems to fail WP:GNG also. There has also been some apparent self-promotion going on, per the edit history, and it seems possible (though not probable) that the biography was in fact created by the subject. There has been some discussion about this person's notability at User_talk:Dougweller#Arch_and_Anth_notability. Sitush (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (collogue) @ 22:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (confer) @ 22:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (confabulate) @ 22:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Seems to be a non-notable graduate student. EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems to be an ordinary graduate student. No evidence of notability (as yet). -- 120.23.60.37 (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. Found a [http://www.ktvq.com/news/sen-tester-gets-earful-on-human-trafficking-in-the-bakken/ mention here] plus there is a [http://www.indianz.com/News/2014/014947.asp possible source here] but overall I don't think there are sufficient sources at this point to meet the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
• Delete The article contains nothing that establishes notability. A doctoral student with some non notable awards. --Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 03:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
• Delete A doctoral student, who lacks any sufficiently notable achievements by Wikipedia's standards that are indicated either in the article or stated in her department's web page. The indicated awards are not notable. -- Paul H. (talk) 02:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.