Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payday (album)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Payday (album)]]=

:{{la|Payday (album)}} ([{{fullurl:Payday (album)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payday (album)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Nominated per this discussion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Payday_II&action=edit§ion=T-1

In essence, neither his second album nor this one are felt to meet WP:NALBUMS. Tyrenon (talk) 02:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete despite the passive construction in the nomination. A Google News [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Payday+fizz&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2000&as_hdate=2019&lnav=hist6 search] reveals minimal, minimal coverage for the album, not enough to pass WP:N. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Doesn't meet notability requirement. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - As I'd stated in the other AfD, while Lil' Fizz is notable enough as a former member of B2K, his solo work has gathered little attention and his solo albums aren't notable enough to merit articles. -- Atamachat 23:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.