Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeRColate

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:18, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

=[[PeRColate]]=

:{{la|PeRColate}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|PeRColate}})

I doubt this Max/MSP plugin is notable enough for a separate article in Wikipedia according to WP:GNG. Academically, it re-implements stuff that introduced elsewhere, and reviews of Max/MSP at best briefly mention it, e.g. [http://emusician.com/software/review-cycling-max-mac-win/] or not at all. [http://www.musicradar.com/gear/all/computers-software/other/maxmsp-5-161225/review] FuFoFuEd (talk) 08:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

  • delete no independent notability. W Nowicki (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
  • keep But useful. If you delete it, it will just get stubbed again. Edrowland (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

:: WP:ITSUSEFUL is not a valid reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

:Then it should be deleted each time until there is any evidence shown of notability. Are threats of disruptive editing are valid reasons to keep an article? W Nowicki (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment on the discussion above: I think that a redirect to Synthesis Toolkit (STK) is probably sufficient to prevent this from being recreated. We can note there that it's not a straight port. I'm not sure what else needs to be said. There are certainly a fair number of ports of STK, and many were done by academics, so the authors' of these ports have written some paper about their endeavor, as it's customary in academia. I don't think that justifies a separate article for each port, although they certainly add notability to STK itself. FuFoFuEd (talk) 10:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete don't see evidence of it meeting WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.