Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace Day (film)

:{{la|Peace Day (film)}} ([{{fullurl:Peace Day (film)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace Day (film)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:{{la|Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty}} -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

No significant coverage. Fails WP:N. Since the band is only barely notable because of having had Maynard James Keenan as a member, their releases do not deserve individual articles. Conical Johnson (talk) 03:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete no notability demonstrated from reliable sources or otherwise. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
• My prior comment was made before the bands article was added to the discussion. On that, I'd opine weak keep' based on the presence of an undoubtably notable member per WP:MUSIC. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

• Merge All three of the albums are not notable on their own but should be included as part of the article on Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty. Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty should not be deleted, even though one of the criteria to make a group notable is "... an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians". " The group article on Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty should be kept because even though there is only one notable member because that member is especially notable and the subject of a featured article.Rcurtis5 (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete both - Just because Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty has an FA member doesn't mean that notability is inherited; IAR doesn't work here. Google News and Scholar turn up empty; Books gives some unrelated Daniel Webster quote. For Peace Day, News, Books, and Scholar have a lot of unrelated results, but none related to the subject in question. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. I agree with King of Hearts and there are no reliable sources or coverage. BioDetective2508 (talk) 04:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.