Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peanut Steiner

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete both. --- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Peanut Steiner]]=

:{{la|Peanut Steiner}} ([{{fullurl:Peanut Steiner|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peanut Steiner}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

First up, looks like a conflict of interest: original author is User:Peanut1010. Probably an autobiographical page. Anyway, doesn't look to pass WP:MUSIC or WP:N. Only useful google hit I found was [http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=131596&command=displayContent&sourceNode=124371&contentPK=19906294&folderPk=55129&pNodeId=124522 this], an article on how he was in an accident and has come back from that, but a single, localised news piece does not demonstrate notability. Record company is simply for self-publishing; the associated band does not look to be notable and was deleted under WP:CSD#A7 earlier today. (As it happens, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Peanut_Steiner so was this article].) I appreciate it has the under construction tab on it but I really don't see any sources available with which to expand the article, and would make a CSD nom a bit distasteful, so I've brought it here instead where I feel it's most appropriate under the circumstances.

Note, I am also nominating the following, the "debut album" from the band which doesn't really even seem to demonstrate any notability, but it's just easier to nominate it here I feel:

:{{la|Hanging In Space}}

Suggesting delete for both. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 15:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

delete. I agree with the nominator; there is no evidence of notability. Although tagged with "under construction", it has not been edited by the creator since March 6th. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.