Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Arrupe Training Center for Leaders and Educators

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Vanamonde (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Pedro Arrupe Training Center for Leaders and Educators]]=

:{{la|Pedro Arrupe Training Center for Leaders and Educators}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pedro_Arrupe_Training_Center_for_Leaders_and_Educators Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Pedro Arrupe Training Center for Leaders and Educators}})

Promo, fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 21:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Comment: I don't have a final opinion because I haven't heard what others have had to say yet, but as a response to the Nom, I, after reading the article don't see it a promo. I also did a google search and found quite a few sites discussing the topic therefore I ask, in what way does it violate WP:GNG. (If I am missing something politely let me know). Grapefruit17 (talk) 22:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Weak keep. At first, I noticed a red flag: This Polish NGO does not have a Polish Wikipedia page yet. Checking the sources, I am not seeing any in-depth coverage, it's either self-published/press releases or mentions in passing. Hence my initial inclination was delete, but doing a search in Polish I saw a few description sentences ('founded in...' etc.) in {{cite book|author=Leszek Molendowski|title=Dzieje ojców jezuitów i szkolnictwa jezuickiego w Gdyni|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RwhQAQAAIAAJ|date=January 2009|publisher=Wydawn. "Avalon"|isbn=978-83-60448-80-9}} but snippet view is preventing me from detailed analysis. It does have an entry in {{cite book|author=Małgorzata Sokołowska|title=Encyklopedia Gdyni|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QA5pAAAAMAAJ|year=2006|publisher=Verbi Causa|isbn=978-83-921571-8-2}}, a regional encyclopedia, through again, a snippet view prevents a more detailed comment. That said, if an organization has an entry in another encyclopedia (even if very regional), I think it is good enough to get a page in Wikipedia. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.