Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegasus Intellectual Capital Solutions

=[[Pegasus Intellectual Capital Solutions]]=

:{{la|Pegasus Intellectual Capital Solutions}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pegasus_Intellectual_Capital_Solutions Stats])

:({{Find sources|Pegasus Intellectual Capital Solutions}})

This article does not meet our strict general notability guideline. (Dear non-Wikipedians: Please see WP:42 for a summary of the guideline.)

[http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Pegasus+Intellectual+Capital+Solutions%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 Zero] Google News Archive hits. I also looked through the first couple of pages of Google search results, but I couldn't find any reliable sources.

  • The Columbia ref is a mere directory listing.
  • The company's cited [http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=225010504 entry] on the [http://investing.businessweek.com/ BusinessWeek Company Insight Center] website is also just a glorified directory listing.

Unforgettableid (talk) 18:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - support nom. wholeheartedly. Dreck; fails WP:CORPDEPTH; should have been PRODed if not for anon IP socks. — Brianhe (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - Only two references; no evidence of WP:NOTABILITY at all. APerson241 (talk!) 19:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.