Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peninsula Engineering Group, Inc.

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Peninsula Engineering Group, Inc.}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Peninsula Engineering Group, Inc.}})

Nominating following PROD and refund request.

Appears to fail WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Appears to mainly cite primary sources, with none sustaining a claim to notability. Various searches are struggling to turn up anything. Mdann52 (talk) 06:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

:The company went through a few name changes: first to Peninsula Wireless Communications, and then to Repeater Technologies. The company was taken public and then went bankrupt under the name Repeater Technologies. Peninsula Engineering Solutions is a successor organization, which was acquired by Infinity Wireless. https://www.infinitiwireless.com/we-are-pleased-to-announce-the-merger-of-their-two-companies/

:The company's patent on split band filtering was a foundational patent in on frequency repeaters for cellular mobile radio. It is cited by 36 other patents, see: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4783843A/en Rabcfi (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 11:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

• Delete. No evidence of passing the WP:NCORP threshold. Sources are WP:PATENTS, which are primary sources. Approved patents may be used for validating that an invention exists but cannot demonstrate notability. WP:BEFORE searches on this company's many names turns up WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in a few sources, plus some WP:TRADES publication coverage, lots of corporate directory listings and more patent info -- but no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: No sources about the company found, some patents and government decisions. Listed in a paper here [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/40126], but not really about the organization. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 16:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.