Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny football (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Penny football}} ([{{fullurl:Penny football|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny football (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Notability not established, no references, uncited, very vague - could refer to various games made up in school which are not called Penny football GTD 01:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - Article is now referenced and cleaned up, and the subject's notability verified with reliable sources. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  16:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - It has references and is cleaned up, and someone may expand this to make it a better article. DeMoN2009 17:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Comment Now it is cited, how about a rename? The name "penny football" does not appear to be the most common GTD 17:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Sure, go ahead and rename it if you want, or discuss it on the talk page for the article. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

• Keep The article is sourced with reliable sources, and the subject is notable.--J.Mundo (talk) 03:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• Keep An article that provides adequate reliable and verifiable sources to support notability. Further expansion would only be a plus. Alansohn (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - per addition of verifiable sources. FingersOnRoids♫ 01:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.