Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percunatel

:{{la|Percunatel}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Percunatel}})

Probable hoax. No sources have been given since the article was created by an IP years ago, nor was the content modified since then. Substantial Google search results are limited to the original page and a couple of its mirrors. Microcell (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

• Comment - "Perun's mother" is an [http://books.google.com/books?id=LJJWAVks8m4C&lpg=PA189&ots=urrfT_s9SJ&dq=%22Perun's%20mother%22%20-purported&pg=PA189#v=onepage&q=%22Perun's%20mother%22%20-purported&f=false existing concept] in Slavic mythology. Seems more likely that "Percunatel" is a peculiar or malformed translation, as opposed to a raw hoax.   — C M B J   01:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

• During a parallel discussion in the Ukrainian Wikipedia it was pointed out that the Lithuanian mythology has a concept of Perkūnaitėlė, purported wife of Perkūnas (Perun). Based on this, I'm inclined to think the IP user simply got it wrong when creating the article in question. It remains only to decide what should be done to it. [https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Percunatel%22#sclient=psy-ab&hl=uk&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=%22Percunatele%22&pbx=1&oq=%22Percunatele%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1376l1376l0l1553l1l1l0l0l0l0l171l171l0.1l1l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=c5d2bb196d1bd062&biw=1280&bih=681 Percunatele] seems to have reliable, however scarce, coverage on the web, which gives it some theoretical chances of survival; but unless any additional information is added I believe it must be redirected as having no standalone value. --Microcell (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

---

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

---

• Keep, following renaming to Percunatele, slight expansion and references added by Uncle G. Still a stub that requires more work, but there's now sufficient there to indicate notability. PWilkinson (talk) 20:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.