Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performance Marketing for Professionals (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to John Rampton. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

=[[Performance Marketing for Professionals]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performance Marketing for Professionals}}

:{{la|Performance Marketing for Professionals}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Performance_Marketing_for_Professionals_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Performance Marketing for Professionals}})

Non notable book. Ireneshih (talk) 15:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete - sources are overhyped PR "reviews" and interviews. No independent in-depth coverage. The overly detailed author biographies, and statements like "The book contains 136 pages and 14 chapters, each divided into individual topics.", are just fillers with trivial information. The article is also most likely a re-creation based on the deleted version. GermanJoe (talk) 17:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Maybe redirect to John Brampton for now? Until a better article can be made at least. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Agree with redirect. The main topic is only barely more notable, but at least it survived an AfD as "no consensus". GermanJoe (talk) 07:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Delete or redirect This book isn't notable yet. The one source that could look to be both reliable and about the book is a blog, not Adweek itself. valereee (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Redirect to John Rampton. Not enough coverage to show notability of book at this time. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.