Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perlvayler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Jclemens (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Perlvayler]]=

:{{la|Perlvayler}} ([{{fullurl:Perlvayler|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perlvayler}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable Perl module. Oscarthecat (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom; very short article. Chutznik (talk) 21:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. The project is in 0.02 beta and hasn't been updated in six years; Google just turns up lots of mirrors for the abandoned SourceForge project page. Rofreg (talk) 03:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perlvayler||}}

Delete - google search provides no evidence of coverage in reliable, third party sources and none are presented in the article, no evidence of other notability. – Toon 21:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.