Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry Dorrestein

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

=[[Perry Dorrestein]]=

:{{la|Perry Dorrestein}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Perry_Dorrestein Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Perry Dorrestein}})

Dorrestein is a non-notable former football player. First, he has not played in a regular season game in a professional league and does not pass WP:NGRIDIRON; he was briefly in the Jets' camp as an undrafted free agent and then on the Bears' practice squad. Second, he received no national or conference honors and has not received national press coverage or won an award that would qualify under WP:NCOLLATH. Third, he has not been the subject of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources so as to pass WP:GNG -- the coverage cited in the article is either routine coverage (e.g., brief roster/injury announcements) or non-independent (profile from the school) rather than in-depth or even medium-depth coverage of Dorrestein. Cbl62 (talk) 21:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete nice looking article but not notable. It sucks to be a lineman. Ah well, AFD is many things but it's not fair. Fails WP:GNG--00:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulmcdonald (talk • contribs)
  • Neutral, I am not quite sure what the contemporary interpretation of WP:GNG is. I think at one time this would have passed, but looking more closely, it is hard to argue that it really should.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:NGRIDIRON, WP:NCOLLATH, and WP:GNG since coverage is just routine sports reporting.Mdtemp (talk) 18:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.