Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perturbative geometry

:{{la|Perturbative geometry}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Perturbative_geometry Stats])

:({{Find sources|Perturbative geometry}})

No sources since last year, concept looks like a generic term rather than a subject covered by reliable sources. Paradoctor (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

• Delete as containing no content. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC).
• Delete per nom. The phrase occurs 5 times in Google Scholar, so not a common phrase, either. -- 101.119.14.70 (talk) 08:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
• Delete unless we find some good sources. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
• Delete per above. For good measure, I double checked some other searches. Bearian (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
• Delete I was unable to find any descriptions of perturbative geometry as a topic in itself; the few uses I found were neologisms with no in depth discussion or references. It is of course possible to talk about the geometric aspects of perturbation theory, e.g., vector spaces of infinitesimal perturbations or variations in variational calculus, but no one seems to consider perturbative geometry as a separate topic of study. A redirect to perturbation theory would be OK, but the term is so rare, it may not be needed. --Mark viking (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.