Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pesalaccia

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No quorum, delete as a WP:SOFTDELETE Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

=[[Pesalaccia]]=

:{{la|Pesalaccia}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Pesalaccia}})

No evidence of notability. Only one of the "references" even mentions "Pesalaccia", and that one does not give any significant coverage. In fact the only statement in the whole article that is supported by a source is that someone named Vincenzo Pesalaccia, aged 50, emigrated to Brazil, arriving on the 14th of May, 1895. This article was written by an editor with a clear conflict of interest (to judge by their username), and it appears to be an attempt to produce a record for their family's surname. That is a perfectly good thing to wish to do, but Wikipedia is not the place to do it. (Author contested PROD, without giving any reason.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete While surnames can be notable, in this case, as it seems to be written more from a genealogical point of view of one particular family, I don't see any notability. 21:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.