Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peshawar Public School and College

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep given the consensus we have for schools (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Peshawar Public School and College]]=

:{{la|Peshawar Public School and College}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peshawar_Public_School_and_College Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Peshawar Public School and College}})

No sources. Completely improperly formatted. Fails WP:GNG Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  • [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Peshawar+Public+School+and+College%22&num=100&hl=en&safe=off&authuser=0&tbm=nws Verifiable] secondary schools are usually considered notable. Is there any reason why this should be an exception? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - We keep high schools because experience shows that, with enough research, sources can almost invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a poor tool for finding sources on schools in the Indian sub-continent. Very few have much of an Internet presence. We need to avoid systemic bias and allow time for local hard-copy and local language sources to be investigated. Just Chilling (talk) 22:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

:*There's not even any need here to look for local hard-copy and local language sources, because this school has coverage available online in English from the Wall Street Journal, which is more than we can say for most American high schools. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Because this high school article is not a hoax. A simple search using Find sources:news gives me two results. Notability is not determined by an articles current sources and content. Gab4gab (talk) 21:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.