Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Byck

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Peter Byck]]=

:{{la|Peter Byck}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Peter Byck}})

Article appears to have been largely written by the subject, completely unsourced with the only source listed returning a 404 error Dexxtrall (talk) 18:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete per WP:GNG, WP:MILL, WP:OR, WP:NOTRESUME, and WP:TNT. We have deleted so many articles about filmmakers because so many of them, to be blunt, are NN and run of the mill like this subject. We have never published original research in 20 years. Whether in 2012 or 2021, everybody has known you can't edit your own article, and it's so poorly written you'd think it was not edited by someone with a college degree. If it is kept, this will require a lot of copyediting. Bearian (talk) 22:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete very clearly a non-notable film director.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HistoricalAccountings (talk) 23:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete A non-notable film director. Tbyros (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete non notable film director. lack of reliable references. LucyLucy (talk) 04:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete - his documentary Carbon Nation is notable but I'm not seeing any notability inherited by Byck for him to warrant an article himself. Even if he did somehow pass one of our guidelines, the article would need a complete overhaul as it is currently a CV and not an encyclopaedia article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.