Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Dubens
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
=[[Peter Dubens]]=
:{{la|Peter Dubens}} – (
:({{Find sources|Peter Dubens}})
Non-notable subject created by new editor. Ireneshih (talk) 06:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Although the article is a mess, he does appear to have some notability. Deb (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 03:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Articles about him in [http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/business/Companies/article1399192.ece The Sunday Times] (not free), [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/the-business-onpeter-dubens-founder-oakley-capital-2290184.html The Independent], [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6f53ed3e-c128-11df-afe0-00144feab49a.html#axzz37bDesmYR Financial Times] and [http://www.standard.co.uk/business/lowprofile-entrepreneur-all-the-highrollers-know-6463917.html London Evening Standard] satisfy WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.