Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter McCormack (Bitcoin Evangelist)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
=[[:Peter McCormack (Journalist)]]=
:{{la|1=Peter McCormack (Journalist)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Peter McCormack (Bitcoin Evangelist)}})
Lack of notability. What little interest there is in this man seems to be localpress coverage related to his purchasing a mediocre football team. TheLongTone (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 14:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Business. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
:Now retitled ....(journalist0. Article creator has removed AfD flag; I have just replaced.TheLongTone (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Pretty humorous attempt at notability, but I don't think much needs to be said here — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrigadierG (talk • contribs) 04:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Most of the sources are his own podcast, He's mentioned more than once in the Bloomberg piece, but I'd much more to consider him notable as per the general notability guideline. CT55555 (talk) 21:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of reliable sources. Marginal WP:SPAM. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.