Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Salamon
=[[Peter Salamon]]=
:{{la|Peter Salamon}} –
:({{findsources|Peter Salamon}})
Delete per WP:PROF. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Phil Bridger (talk) 13:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. His top paper, "Neural network ensembles", has 1359 citations in Google scholar, and he has four other publications with over 100 citations each. That amounts to a clear pass of WP:PROF #1 to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons above. Would the prodder care to elaborate on the reasons for his prod; they do not seem at all clear to me? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC).
- Keep. Meets WP:PROF criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). In addition to what David Eppstein said, the subject has a total of over 3,300 citations on HPoP, and an h-index of 24.--Eric Yurken (talk) 00:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
:Please could you tell us what HPoP is? Xxanthippe (talk) 01:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC).
::It's Harzing's PoP citation analysis software. It uses Google Scholar. The "PoP" stands for "publish or perish".--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
:::Thanks. I found it here: http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm Unfortunately there isn't a Mac version. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC).
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.