Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Scott-Morgan

:{{la|Peter Scott-Morgan}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peter_Scott-Morgan Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Peter Scott-Morgan}})

Article might not meet notability requirements as per WP:BIO. Tow (talk) 01:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

• Keep Cites many sources establishing notability. — Music1201 ^talk 05:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

• (EC with above) Keep perhaps as not my field of interest at all, but this seems to be enough. SwisterTwister talk 00:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

• DeleteThe numerous sources listed are mostly reviews of his books or examples of consultant blogs complimenting other consultant blogs. It reads like an advertisement. No mention in reputable sources like Forbes, Business Week, The Wall Street Journal, etc. RockyMtChai (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.