Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Theron

:{{la|Peter Theron}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peter_Theron Stats])

:({{Find sources|Peter Theron}})

Non-notable instructor; fails :WP:PROF and :WP:POLITICIAN. Orange Mike | Talk 23:10, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

• Delete. As per nominator. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC).
• Delete. As, apparently, a non-research mathematician (I found only his thesis research in Google scholar, with no citations, and MathSciNet also has nothing else by him) he fails WP:PROF. And as a two-time unsuccessful political candidate he fails WP:POLITICIAN. There's some minor news coverage of his political activities (e.g. [http://www.wrex.com/Global/story.asp?S=12470383 this one]) which is about him and not completely trivial, but I don't think it rises to the level of overriding WP:POLITICIAN. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
• Delete. As the WP:SCHOLAR says, "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.", there is no signs of the person receiving a award. The article doesn't tell much about the political career. ///EuroCarGT 01:07, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.