Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Ubertaccio

:{{la|Peter Ubertaccio}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peter_Ubertaccio Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Peter Ubertaccio}})

Does not meet WP:PROF as an leader in his field, because of the almost nonexistent publications, Does not meet it because of administrative work, for the level of the work is not high enough,..Does not meet it as an innovator in education, for the same reason.

Any notability would be as a political operative, and would need to be show by GHN. "Often quoted by.." is not enough of a specification in that field, nor in being an analyst on a few television programs. DGG ( talk ) 07:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 07:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. Notability not found WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC).
• Delete If we had sources showing he was cited as the leading expert on Massachusetts politics that might work, but the sources we have are not enough.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.