Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Wick
=[[Peter Wick]]=
:{{la|Peter Wick}} ([{{fullurl:Peter Wick|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Wick}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Unnotable filmmaker/comedian. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Just an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY written by Wick himself under the account User:Juventinopw (or a fan, but seems most likely its Wick). Pro removed by new user User:Nosehillbranch without explanation and whose primary edits have been deprodding articles. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
:Delete - Nothing in there hints at something that would be notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. IF that's that most notable they can make him sound he's clearly not. (Another deprod-only account? Color me unsurprised. At the very list tracking their edits makes it easy to ID articles that need to be AFDed.) DreamGuy (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Fair enough deprod as winning a film award is a decent assertion of notability. The accolades for [http://www.indieflix.com/Films/MoviePizzaLove More Pizza Love] and his award for [http://www.indieflix.com/Films/MoviePizzaLove "Most Promising Director"] can certainly be sourced... but there is just nothing available in reliable sources to support his leghthy and fluffy BLP. No offense to Peter, but its time to make more than 2 films and get some press for your stand-up work. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.