Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Roosevelt
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Phil Roosevelt}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Roosevelt}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Phil Roosevelt}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Also, primary article's author blanked and G7 has been performed. UtherSRG (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Phil Roosevelt]]=
:{{la|1=Phil Roosevelt}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Phil Roosevelt}})
NN journalist UtherSRG (talk) 23:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 23:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- :Yes, please delete the article. Philroose1 (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
:Hello, this is Phil Roosevelt, and I would like the page deleted. Thanks for your efforts with it. Philroose1 (talk) 03:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.