Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhillComm Global
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 21:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
=[[:PhillComm Global]]=
:{{la|1=PhillComm Global}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=PhillComm Global}})
No indication of WP:SIGCOV, possible advertisement TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 23:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, Georgia (U.S. state), and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:Speedy delete No coverage online outside of self-published materials and the limited, PR-style, Forbes article (fails WP:GNG & WP:SIGCOV, as mentioned in nom.). Could also be self-published. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 07:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:SPAM. Blatantly promotional tone, for a small PR firm less than four years old. In 2025, everyone knows that we are not a free web host nor LinkedIn. We are a charity, and using us is a violation of our tax-exempt status. Protect against likely re-creation. Bearian (talk) 00:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
:Speedy delete spam, no reliable press coverage. BoraVoro (talk) 08:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.