Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix P-12 Community College

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Not promotional and also WP:SK 3 (non-admin closure) Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:53, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

=[[Phoenix P-12 Community College]]=

:{{la|Phoenix P-12 Community College}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Phoenix_P-12_Community_College Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Phoenix P-12 Community College}})

G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion --Mr.Luther34-- 16:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Strong keep. Tone is not unsalvageably promotional—I don't even think it's promotional at all. Lots of sources, even if most are primary. Not a bad start for a school article. —C.Fred (talk) 17:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Keep How can the article be "advertising" when it is a tuition free state run school with nothing to sell? Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, there is a well established working consensus that secondary schools are notable, unless a hoax is involved or sources are entirely lacking. Rather than trying to delete the article, it would be better to improve it. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

::If the article were written like a promotional piece for the school, that would be one thing. However, this reads like an encyclopedia article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Keep Doesn't appear particularly promotional. Secondary schools are generally notable on their own. clpo13_(talk) 20:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Strong keep Not promotional material, is a state school. There are many other wikipedia pages about schools which are very similar to this one. EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep - appears to meet WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.