Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhpAnts

=[[PhpAnts]]=

:{{la|PhpAnts}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:PhpAnts}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|PhpAnts}})

Totally fails any sort of notability. Triwbe (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete I PRODded this, and seconds later it was tagged for speedy deletion. The author removed the speedy, so possibly that could've been reinstated, but because of the PROD...I'm not sure. Anyway - here we are. My PROD reasoning still stands; This does not appear to meet the general notability guidelines; it does not show coverage in appropriate independent reliable sources, and I cannot find such coverage. See WP:VRS.  Chzz  ►  20:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Normally I like to support these quirky open source software WP articles, but zero presence on the inter web, means quick delete. Suggest WP:OR Speedy Delete. scope_creep (talk) 22:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy Close & Delete Mostly OR and NN, with a dash of spam. Google results show essentially nothing. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:35, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. WP:SOAP, WP:RS, WP:GNG. Ipsign (talk) 15:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.