Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piedmontese Wikipedia
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 14:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
=[[Piedmontese Wikipedia]]=
:{{la|Piedmontese Wikipedia}} – (
:({{Find sources|Piedmontese Wikipedia}})
Non-notable version of Wikipedia; the article doesn't include any third-party sources. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. The fact that there are 57,000 articles could be challenged, but has not been challenged. It's a new article, appropriately tagged for addition of sources. I have to believe that this is notable, and that there is coverage in Piedmont and Italy, in Italian and Piedmontese, of this Wikipedia. Let it develop.--doncram 23:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- "I have to believe"? Can you prove that this article meets WP:GNG or not?--eh bien mon prince (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, it seems that other language wikipedias have English entries, I can't see a reason why this one would be any different.Bali88 (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.