Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pijom

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Pastor Theo (talk) 00:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Pijom]]=

:{{la|Pijom}} ([{{fullurl:Pijom|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pijom}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Neologism or hoax, zero sources, and searches on Google reveal nothing more than a few MySpace profiles and foreign language sites. For one reason or another the speedy deletion was rejected. GraYoshi2x►^talk 18:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete - not a word that is recognized by any authority. As an interesting quirk of OCR, it has not received any coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete - This should be CSD material. At best it's a wikitionary candidate, but I see no evidence that's justified. Shadowjams (talk) 06:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.