Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PikeOS
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. per keep argumens which are more convincing and providing new sources WP HEY, wp before (non-admin closure) Cinder painter (talk) 06:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
=[[:PikeOS]]=
:{{la|1=PikeOS}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=PikeOS}})
fails notability guidelines, see specifically WP:PRODUCT. a WP:BEFORE failed to return significant coverage in reliable sources.
note: was previously prodded by me before being deprodded here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 09:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
::*Delete Can't find any independent in-depth sources on PikeOS. There are some academic sources, but most are from the company/employees of the company. A significant portion of the article reads like promotion for SYSGO as well/a good portion of the article was written by User:Sysgo. With a lack of sources + promotional material I think it should go. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 21:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
::*:The abstract of this paper{{Cite journal |last1=姜维 |last2=朱元 |last3=吴志红 |last4=杜展志 |last5=王恩东 |date=2020 |title= |script-title=zh:基于Hypervisor的汽车域控制器解决方案 |trans-title=Hypervisor-Based Automotive Domain Controller Solution |url=https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2020&filename=HBYD202007001 |journal=信息通信 |issue=7 |pages=1–4, 8 |access-date=2025-04-30}} by Sino-German College, Tongji University & FAW Group says: [...] designs an RTOS and Linux system suitable for the PikeOS Hypervisor; designs communication programs and verification methods between RTOS partitions and Linux partitions on the PikeOS Hypervisor; designs a test program for the real-time performance of PikeOS; and verifies the feasibility of the design scheme by running it on the Xilinx ZCU 104 single-chip microcomputer. 内存溢出的猫 (talk) 18:28, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
::*::That someone used a commercial product in their research does not make it automatically notable. There are definitely other academic sources out there (e.g. [https://people.cs.ksu.edu/~danielwang/Investigation/Formal_Verification/Kuz_Petters_07.pdf#page=50]) but many are written by employees of sysgo making them non-independent. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:01, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
{{Reflist-talk}}
:
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep there is wide coverage in academic sources (conference and journal papers, books). As far as I can tell, quite a few of them are independent [https://www.google.es/books/edition/Rapid_Prototyping_Software_for_Avionics/f7tYBQAAQBAJ][https://www.google.es/books/edition/Formal_Methods_for_Software_Engineering/YtJ2EAAAQBAJ][https://www.google.es/books/edition/FPGAs_and_Parallel_Architectures_for_Aer/gBEpCwAAQBAJ]. --MarioGom (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep a quick scan of this and the .de wiki - looks like more than a couple to pass GNG. Widefox; talk 16:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think the sources show that it has wide coverage or notable. Reads like a product promotion with hyped up jargon. Ramos1990 (talk) 00:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.