Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PillarOne.RiskAnalytics

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

=[[:PillarOne.RiskAnalytics]]=

:{{la|PillarOne.RiskAnalytics}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PillarOne.RiskAnalytics Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|PillarOne.RiskAnalytics}})

Per several source searches, this risk modeling tool does not meet WP:GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:42, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Comment: The author of this article has requested deletion in good faith by adding a prod tag to the article. He has also sent me an email stating this. However, G7 doesn't apply here as at least one other user has made substantive edits. Please consider this request when closing this AfD. Thanks. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 18:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.