Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pimp post

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Danger ^{High voltage!} 19:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Pimp post]]=

:{{la|Pimp post}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pimp_post Stats])

:({{Find sources|Pimp post}})

This page should be deleted because Pimp posts are not notable and may even be a hoax or a name coined by one person. I would have speedied it under A7, but I was reluctant to (even though it was web content). Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 18:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

:Speedy delete as a G12 of [http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090609160314AA0PQ0W this link.] A7 would also apply in this situation. Valenciano (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.