Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Paciorek

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Piotr Paciorek]]=

:{{la|Piotr Paciorek}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Piotr_Paciorek Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Piotr Paciorek}})

Non-notable academic--the article reads like a resume, and I haven't found any secondary sources discussing him or his work. gnu 57 06:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete non-notable as an academic or as a member of the Roman Catholic clergy, also per WP:NOTRESUME. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Per nom. Reads like a CV. Britishfinance (talk) 14:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.