Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plop: The Hairless Elbonian

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. "Keep" at AfD means not delete, and merging or improving the article is at editor's discretion. --PeaceNT (talk) 11:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Plop: The Hairless Elbonian]]=

{{ns:0|M}}

:{{la|Plop: The Hairless Elbonian}} ([{{fullurl:Plop: The Hairless Elbonian|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plop: The Hairless Elbonian}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No reliable sources found. Strip was incredibly short-lived. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Merge into Scott Adams. The only reason this is more notable than anything else is because it was created by him, and that's not enough for its own article. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 21:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. No reliable sources? That means it'd be going against WP:V to merge, though that's what I'd really like to do. —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 22:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge into Scott Adams. Good place for it.--Father Goose (talk) 07:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep and Improve - If less inter-universe and more public reaction-type information is added, then I think this article constitutes as important and relevant and, most of all, saveable. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 14:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
  • :You'd have to find and add that information yourself for this suggestion to hold weight. I did a quick look and didn't find anything about the subject aside from the primary sources already used in the article.--Father Goose (talk) 21:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.