Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop-house
=[[Pop-house]]=
:{{la|Pop-house}} – (
:({{Find sources|Pop-house}})
I am proposing this article for deletion because it does not meet WP:GNG. After doing a good faith search on Google (including Google Books) I honestly don't think this genre even exist. //Gbern3 (talk) 09:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
:Delete - No reliable sources are evident so appears to fails to meet WP:NOTE.--SabreBD (talk) 08:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 06:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I'd suggest redirecting to Dance-pop but cue endless debates about the difference between the 2 genres. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete another made-up musical genre, the article even says that it is "more commonly known as 'commercial dance'", no it isn't because it doesn't exist. The article then goes on to list a rag-tag collection of artists that have nothing in common genre-wise: Coldcut are not in the same register as Daft Punk, Bomb the Bass do not electrorock out like Digitalism and so on. Maybe Guetta and Dannii Minogue would be considered "commercial dance" music but that's beside the point. This is rubbish. CaptainScreebo Parley! 20:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.