Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Fiction and Sizzle Books

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Pop Fiction and Sizzle Books]]=

:{{la|Pop Fiction and Sizzle Books}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pop_Fiction_and_Sizzle_Books Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Pop Fiction and Sizzle Books}})

Non-notable imprint. No reliable sources listed, nothing obvious shown through a brief search for general webpages, news or books. Bjelleklang - talk 13:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - no indication of notability, and the article was apparently created to help collectors of the books "keep track of their collections"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bjelleklang&diff=641090686&oldid=641089965] - pretty much an admission of the fact that there are no secondary sources for the information. --bonadea contributions talk 14:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Per above. Widr (talk) 15:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  • delete Lack of substantial independent sources. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Very NN, nothing out there to be found and if the list (because it basically is one) is merely there to help track things then make a wiki over at Wikia, it's not content we want nor specifically need. tutterMouse (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.