Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PornDigger! (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[PornDigger!]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PornDigger!}}

:{{la|PornDigger!}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|PornDigger!}})

Lacks substantial multiple coverage in RS sources. Most coverage in gbooks/gnews consists of wp mirrors, and the rest is not substantial. Epeefleche (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 11:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete, wow, Wikipedia was a different place when this was last AFD'd. No sources found anywhere. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete: Still no notability shown. SL93 (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.