Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porta-bote
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Porta-bote]]=
:{{la|1=Porta-bote}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Porta-bote}})
Cites no sources, reads like an advertisement for the company that makes it DirtyHarry991 (talk) 06:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Products, and Sports. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 06:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Weak keep, this review in a NZ magazine [https://fishingmag.co.nz/boats-tests-buying-using-dinghies-kayaks-trailers/porta-bote-genesis-lll-test#google_vignette] and some discussion in Australia [https://www.smh.com.au/business/small-business/foldable-boats--what-will-they-think-of-next-20131004-2uy5y.html] Oaktree b (talk) 16:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Subject passes the WP:GNG with the sources provided in this discussion. Some promotional language stands to be removed but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. User:Let'srun 14:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. If the article weren't so ancient, I'd suggest draftifying. Suitskvarts (talk) 10:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.