Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portia Rosenberg

:{{la|Portia Rosenberg}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Portia Rosenberg}})

fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO. gnews count is small and merely confirms she illustrated one book. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Portia+Rosenberg&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 07:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

• Redirect to Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell. The book is highly notable, and her contribution to it could be expanded at that article (currently a mere mention). --MelanieN (talk) 19:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

• Redirect per Melanie. Who knows, maybe a properly-written article might be justifiable, but if the creator can only be bothered to write one line, why research? Johnbod (talk) 11:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.