Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postmodern perspective of back-channel networks

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Postmodern perspective of back-channel networks]]=

:{{la|Postmodern perspective of back-channel networks}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Postmodern_perspective_of_back-channel_networks Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Postmodern perspective of back-channel networks}})

Appears to be an essay. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - WP:OR and an essay (per nom). Could add "postmodern perspective of" just about anything and apply Baudrillard, et al. Even if there were a source or two on the subject, at best it would merit a mention at another postmodernism-related article (of which there are several). --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


  • Delete At best this is an original essay violating WP:OR. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.