Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pouya Saraei
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein.) North America1000 20:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
=[[:Pouya Saraei]]=
:{{la|Pouya Saraei}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Pouya Saraei}})
Per WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG the subject is simply not notable enough for their own WP:BLP Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 23:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 23:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- He is also described on the Persian Wikipedia, at :fa:پویا سرایی: see User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Regarding Pouya Saraei.Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Sources have been cleaned up and added, along with style fixes since originally posting the article for deletion. Still need a second set of eyes to determine if the subject meets WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. Cheers Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 15:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I had initially tagged the article for A7, which the deleting admin (Anthony Appleyard) proceeded to speedily-delete. The article creator, User:Arassaeedian sent me a message on my talk page explaining there is a version of the article on Persian Wikipedia, and I contacted the deleting admin to review the speedy deletion. The original message from the user was,
:"Hi Thanks for reviewing my article with subject of (Pouya Saraei)... but it`s a question for me that why you voted for nomination of deletion? what was my fault? my article was about a famous persian instrumentalist that have persian wikipedia(https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%BE%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%A7_%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C) and you can ckeck it... for example he is the first instrumentalist that played in the first persian traditional track that was about santour with oerchestra in modern music genre... it was published by Navona Records... you can check it or he has albums in iTunes and Amazon.com what can i do that my article become acceptable? thanks you for helping... best regards -- Arassaeedian (talk • contribs) 12:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)" Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 16:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
:Comment The creator of the article left a comment on the talk page of this deletion debate that probably should be checked Feinoha Talk 16:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
::That message is now here. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
{{inbox|Pouya Saraei is a famous Iranian musician that works in persian classical music genre.you can see in persian wikipedia: https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%BE%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%A7_%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C... also the first Persian Musical piece that have been composed for Santour and orchestra was (as far as possible) that Pouya Saraei was Santour instrumentalist in this musical piece.in other words He is the first Santour instrumentalist in genre of Modern Music in Iran.this track is in (Modes) album that was published by Navona Records...also it is available on iTunes and Amazon.com... also Pouya Saraei has composed Music songs and melodies in (Gahi,Segahi) album that is availabe on iTunes and Amazon.com and vocalist was Mohammad Motamedi that you can see(Gahi,Segahi)album in his album list... Pouya Saraei had several concert tours with Simorq ensemble and Dastan Ensemble and links about my claims are in the references of article... thank you. Arassaeedian (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)}}
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.