Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power2SME

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus for salting. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Power2SME]]=

:{{la|Power2SME}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Power2SME Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Power2SME}})

highest degree of promotions. Written by company influenced individual. Does not provide an ounce of notability for Encyclopedia material. Few media sources are not enough to make anything encyclopedia material. where such companies are known by their customers or relative people. There are no nation or international notability is established. One of the thousands companies in India. It is not a Bloomberg directory. Light2021 (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete and Salt as not only by an apparent advertising-only account who is now naturally not active, but this was in fact deleted 2 years ago for both G11 and G12, therefore it shows concerns they were so eager for an article, they started one again within that next year; from the article literally simply having advertising sources, that's not saying a lot, especially the fact this is was an advertisement twice, and from this current one's beginning. We have not and never shall make compromises to keep and tolerate such blatancy. SwisterTwister talk 03:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete & salt as corporate spam that would not go away. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete: Doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH at this time, and yes, the article reads promotional. I however, see no reason to salt the title; last it was deleted in 2014. I agree we would not lose anything, but that's not a very good reason. Delete for failing notability. Anup [Talk] 18:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.