Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerSuite

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[PowerSuite]]=

:{{la|PowerSuite}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|PowerSuite}})

prodded. suspected meatpuppet declined. advert, fails WP:PRODUCT Gaijin42 (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete The only "sources" are really advertisements. Stedrick (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 10:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Delete per stedrickRyan shell (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Delete: the vendor did a good job of building [http://www.uniblue.com/software/powersuite/reviews/ the anthology of his products' reviews], where we can see that of reliable sources only two download sites covered the suite as whole: TechRepublic and Softpedia. This is just not enough. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.