Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Saves

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 13:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Power Saves]]=

:{{la|Power Saves}} ([{{fullurl:Power Saves|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Saves}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested PROD. After doing a cursory search, I could not find any verifiable, third-party sources establishing notability of this product. MuZemike (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete No claim of notability and I can't find anything indicating that it is. ~ AmeIiorate _{U T C} @ 03:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete, fails WP:NOTE. Without significant coverage in reliable sources this is not an encyclopaedic topic, no matter the rather high number of ghits. --Amalthea^Talk 08:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:SOURCES (by not having any). -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 10:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete though not a hoax at all, it's non-notable and and is little more then a dictionary definition. If anything, copy to wikitionary. Mm 40 (talk | contribs) 15:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
It's a non-notable commercial product, so a dictionary term wouldn't make much sense. MuZemike (talk) 20:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.